House Concurrent Resolution 2021

House Concurrent Resolution 2021

June 24, 20255 min read

House Engrossed
property tax; refund; nuisance enforcement.

State of Arizona
House of Representatives
Fifty-sixth Legislature
Second Regular Session
2024


HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2021

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
ENACTING AND ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE PEOPLE OF A MEASURE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX.


(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

  1. Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the State of Arizona,

  2. the Senate concurring:

  3. 1. Under the power of the referendum, as vested in the Legislature,

  4. the following measure, relating to municipal transaction privilege tax, is

  5. enacted to become valid as a law if approved by the voters and on

  6. proclamation of the Governor:

  7. AN ACT

  8. AMENDING SECTION 42-6015, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING

  9. TO MUNICIPAL TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX.

  10. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

  11. Section 1. Section 42-6015, Arizona Revised Statutes,

  12. is amended to read:

  13. 42-6015. Municipal transaction privilege tax; food;

  14. exemption

  15. A. If a city, town or other taxing jurisdiction imposes

  16. a transaction privilege, sales, use, franchise or other

  17. similar tax or fee, however denominated, on:

  18. 1. SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION, the sale of

  19. food items intended for human consumption as defined by rule

  20. adopted pursuant to section 42-5106 or items prescribed by

  21. section 42-5106, subsection D for home consumption, the tax

  22. must be applied uniformly with respect to all food, and an

  23. additional tax or fee differential may not be assessed or

  24. applied with respect to any specific food item.

  25. 2. The sale of food items intended for human

  26. consumption as defined by rule adopted pursuant to section

  27. 42-5106 or items prescribed by section 42-5106, subsection D

  28. for consumption on the premises, the tax must be applied

  29. uniformly with respect to all food items, and an additional

  30. tax or fee differential may not be assessed or applied with

  31. respect to any specific food item.

  32. B. A city, town or other taxing jurisdiction may not

  33. levy a transaction privilege, sales, use, franchise or other

  34. similar tax or fee, however denominated, with respect to:

  35. 1. FROM AND AFTER JUNE 30, 2027, THE SALE OF FOOD ITEMS

  36. INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AS DEFINED BY RULE ADOPTED

  37. PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-5106 OR ITEMS PRESCRIBED BY SECTION

  38. 42-5106, SUBSECTION D FOR HOME CONSUMPTION UNLESS THE CITY,

  39. TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION COMPLIES WITH THE

  40. REQUIREMENTS PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION.

  41. 1. 2. The manufacture, wholesale or distribution to or

  42. among any wholesalers, distributors or retailers, of food

  43. items intended for human consumption as defined by rule

  44. adopted pursuant to section 42-5106 or items prescribed by

  1. section 42-5106, subsection D for home consumption or for

  2. consumption on the premises.

  3. 2. 3. Any container or packaging used exclusively for

  4. transporting, protecting or consuming food items intended for

  5. human consumption as defined by rule adopted pursuant to

  6. section 42-5106 or items prescribed by section 42-5106,

  7. subsection D for home consumption or for consumption on the

  8. premises.

  9. 3. 4. The sale of food or other items purchased with

  10. United States department of agriculture food stamp coupons

  11. issued under the food stamp act of 1977 (P.L. 95-113; 91 Stat.

  12. 958) or food instruments issued under section

  13. of the child 12 nutrition act (P.L. 95-627; 92 Stat. 3603; P.L. 99-661,

  14. section 4302; 42 United States Code section 1786) but may

  15. impose such a tax consistent with this section on other sales

  16. of food.

  17. 4. 5. The sale of low or reduced-cost articles of food

  18. or drink to eligible elderly or homeless persons or persons

  19. with a disability by a business subject to tax under the

  20. restaurant classification pursuant to section 42-5074 that

  21. contracts with the department of economic security and that is

  22. approved by the food and nutrition service of the United

  23. States department of agriculture pursuant to the supplemental

  24. nutrition assistance program established by the food and

  25. nutrition act of 2008 (7 United States Code sections 2011

  26. through 2036c), if the purchases are made with the benefits

  27. issued pursuant to the supplemental nutrition assistance

  28. program.

  29. C. TO IMPOSE A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE,

  30. FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED,

  31. PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SECTION, A CITY,

  32. TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION:

  33. 1. FOR A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION THAT

  34. HAS APPROVED THE IMPOSITION OF A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES,

  35. USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER

  36. DENOMINATED, PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS

  37. SECTION ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2025, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING

  38. APPLY:

  39. (a) FOR A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION THAT

  40. IMPOSES A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR

  41. OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, AT A RATE THAT

  42. IS LESS THAN TWO PERCENT OF THE BASE, ANY INCREASE OF THE

  43. TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR

  44. TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE

  1. VOTERS OF THE CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION AND MAY

  2. NOT BE MORE THAN TWO PERCENT OF THE TAX BASE.

  3. (b) FOR A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION THAT

  4. IMPOSES A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR

  5. OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, AT A RATE THAT

  6. IS TWO PERCENT OR MORE OF THE BASE, THE CITY, TOWN OR OTHER

  7. TAXING JURISDICTION MAY NOT INCREASE THE RATE.

  8. (c) AN INCREASE OF THE TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES,

  9. USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER

  10. DENOMINATED, MUST NOT OCCUR IN THE TWENTY-FOUR-MONTH PERIOD

  11. PRECEDING JUNE 30, 2027.

  12. 2. FOR A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION THAT

  13. HAS NOT APPROVED THE IMPOSITION OF A TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE,

  14. SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER

  15. DENOMINATED, PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS

  16. SECTION ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2025, BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING

  17. APPLY:

  18. (a) THE ADOPTION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT INCREASE OF THE

  19. TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR

  20. TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE

  21. VOTERS OF THE CITY, TOWER OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION AND MAY

  22. NOT BE MORE THAN TWO PERCENT OF THE TAX BASE.

  23. (b) THE ADOPTION OR SUBSEQUENT INCREASE OF THE

  24. TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE, SALES, USE, FRANCHISE OR OTHER SIMILAR

  25. TAX OR FEE, HOWEVER DENOMINATED, MUST NOT OCCUR IN THE

  26. TWENTY-FOUR-MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING JUNE 30, 2027.

  27. Sec. 2. Retroactivity

  28. This act applies retroactively to from and after

  29. December 31, 2024.

  30. 2. The Secretary of State shall submit this proposition to the

  31. voters at the next general election as provided by article IV, part 1,

  32. section 1, Constitution of Arizona.

James G. Busby, Jr.

James G. Busby, Jr.

James G. Busby, Jr. is a Shareholder at The Cavanagh Law Firm where his practice involves all areas of Arizona state and local tax (SALT) including sales, use, gross receipts, transaction privilege, excise, luxury, tobacco, and severance taxes, as well as income, real, and personal property taxes. For nearly 30 years, James has assisted his clients with state and local tax planning, litigation and controversy, legislation, and policy matters. Before entering private practice, he served as Chief Auditor for sales tax at the Arizona Department of Revenue. In his law practice, and before that while working for two of the world’s largest accounting firms (Arthur Andersen and Deloitte), James has successfully advised and represented numerous clients of all sizes, and from numerous industries, in a wide variety of tax matters. He is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel, was selected by his peers for inclusion in the The Best Lawyers in America® for Tax Law and for Litigation and Controversy–Tax, was named a PHOENIX Magazine Top Lawyer in Tax Law, is a member of the invitation-only Independent SALT Alliance, a national network of state and local tax advisors, received the State Bar of Arizona Tax Law Section's 2024 Henry Tom Outstanding Tax Attorney Award (commonly known as the Tax Section's "Lifetime Achievement Award"), and is Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated.™ James lectures extensively on state and local tax topics. He co-authored Bloomberg's Arizona Corporate Income Tax Navigator, and he co-authored the chapter regarding the Judicial Review of Taxation in the Arizona Appellate Handbook published by the State Bar of Arizona. James also wrote a column relating to Arizona tax issues for State Tax Notes entitled SALT From My Saddle, and a column on state and local tax topics for the AZ CPA Magazine entitled A Dash of SALT.

LinkedIn logo icon
Back to Blog