The 2nd Circuit recently found that the sale of counterfeit branded goods was not covered as advertising injury under a commercial general liability policy. In USF&G v. Fendi Adele S.R.L., 823 F.3d 146 (2nd Cir. 2016), applying New York law, upheld the district court’s ruling that the commercial general liability policy issued by USF&G did not cover sales of counterfeit goods because the sale of counterfeit goods did not qualify as an advertising injury. The court found that the sale and resulting injury of counterfeit goods was not, itself, an advertisement of the counterfeit goods. The court drew a distinction between the act of placing a counterfeit branded label on a handbag and the act of actually soliciting customers through advertisements.
- Court Finds that an Earth Movement Exclusion Included Landslides
- What’s in a Label? Coverage for Advertising Injury?
- Cavanagh Law Adds Two Experienced Associates
- The 11th Circuit Court Of Appeals, Interpreting Georgia Law, Recently Enforced A UIM Excess Policy Exhaustion Requirement In Disallowing A UIM Claim
- The Cavanagh Law Firm Obtains Defense Verdict in Defense of Motorhome Manufacturer and Dealership
There are no upcoming events at this time.